Curt's Posts

454 Hours to go…release the robos!

Source: Robert Ariail, Spartanburg Herald Journal

I just checked election day countdown. There’s 18 days and 22 hours left for the polls close in Minnesota. If you’re months deep into managing a campaign, you’ve already transitioned your focus from fundraising to staging for getting out the vote.

For those of us who live outside of the world politics and campaigns, we also notice the increase use of a particular and very unwelcomed interruption: those dreaded robocalls. This tool is one of the markers of a poorly run campaign.

So why do both issue and candidate campaigns use them?

  1. They’re cheap: After burning through millions of dollars and lawn signs, television ads and other high-priced tools, robo-calls seem like a bargain. At $.03-$.05 per call, campaigns can reach thousands of potential voters for the cost of one midmarket TV spot.
  2. They’re labor free: Campaign staff spend tremendous amounts of time recruiting volunteers to make phone calls to win over thousands of swing voters. Robocalls can be set up in a matter of just a few hours of staff time.
  3. They can leverage celebrity endorsements: The social psychology thinking goes something like this, let’s get a well-loved celebrity, like Morgan Freeman, to record the message. Since Mr. Freeman is well known and regarded, people will welcome message from him.
  4. They’re habit forming: Campaign managers are creatures of habit. The logic goes that robocalls were likely used in prior campaigns where they volunteered, and then staffed, and then ran on their own. The first time someone smokes a cigarette, they are unlikely to get addicted. But after that second third or fourth cancer stick, they’re more likely to become smoker.

Too many campaign managers are addicted to robocalls, and they’ve become a cancer within the industry. So why should they kicked the habit?

  1. They don’t work: Numerous scientific studies over the last decade have shown that robocalls contribute zero impact when used as a get out the vote (GOTV) tool.
  2. People screen calls: In the days before caller ID, answering the phone was a crapshoot. Today, unrecognized phone numbers rarely break through a person’s screening.
  3. They irritate supporters: And if campaigns have to use the recognized number counter call screening, they risk doing little more than irking the people who support them financially and volunteer their time.
  4. They can be illegal: If a campaign robocalls a mobile phone without prior consent, they could be hit with a $16,000 fine per instance by the FCC.

SMS is a better alternative to robocalls. An effective GOTV campaign will win any close race. Your core supporters are more likely to opt-in text messaging, especially millennial voters, because they’re less intrusive. Here’s a few ways they can use text messaging to get out the vote:

  • Offer to send a reminder to vote: While presidential election cycles see greater turnout, a simple reminder on Election Day can have a great impact in primary and midterm races.
  • Asking supporters to forward messages: Thankfully, forwarding a robocalls is pretty tough to do. Asking supporter to forward text message to remind their friends about registering to vote, applying for an absence a ballot or simply asked them if they voted is relatively painless. And it also comes from someone they know.
  • Asking for help: The people who opt into your mobile list are more likely to be your strongest supporters. So why not ask them to volunteer? Campaigns can send out a quick message about volunteer opportunities on Election Day. It’s likely to be more efficient than having volunteers call other potential volunteers.

In time, text messaging and other mobile tools might find kick the robocall addiction. Until then, the best we can do is to screen our calls. If you’d like to do more to end the scourge of robocalls, check out this great program from the Citizens for Civil Discourse.

PoliMinute: 21 August 2012

“Pull Out Your Phones, Please.”

I just got back from the Vice President Biden rally in downtown Minneapolis. There were the ample cheers, community praises and campaign promises that you’d expect at these types of events. The shift happened when Minneapolis Mayor RT Rybak asked the crowd:

“Pull out your phones please. Let me see them in the air. Now text MN to 62262 so that we can let you know what’s happening.”

This is the first time that I heard anyone make this type of call-to-action in this election cycle (besides our clients). In 2008, the Obama campaign used SMS to great extent. The campaign first flashed an opt-in message during their Super Bowl ad in 2008, and added nearly 750,000 to their list within minutes. Through Election Day 2012, it was hard to miss that opt in message: Text HOPE to 62262.

And in 2012: nothing. To sign up for Obama’s was SMS list, you need to go to their homepage, scroll down to the bottom and click on SMS. That’s certainly not the best approach for building your SMS list.

Romney’s campaign isn’t doing much better. I had to do a few Google searches to discover that the campaign buried its opt-in message to the bottom of its privacy statement page: http://www.mittromney.com/privacy.

With the advent of other mobile tools, such as apps, both presidential campaigns have pushed SMS to the back seat. While other tools might be flashy, there simply is no more effective mobile tool at engaging and empowering supporters than SMS, especially when reaching communities of color and younger voters.

It’s in the best interest of both campaigns to reconsider their SMS use.

(Photo Credit: Jerry Holt, Star Tribune)

PoliMinute: 31 July 2012

Has Romney Updated a 2008 Obama Tactic?

If there’s one thing in the presidential campaign that can grab attention, it’s a running mate announcement. Four years ago, Obama sent nearly 3,000,000 people this text message at approximately 3:09AM EST:

Barack has chosen Senator Joe Biden to be our VP nominee. Watch the first Obama-Biden rally live at 3 PM Eastern time on www.BarackObama.com. Spread the word!

While there were a lot of finger-pointing for that early wake-up text and some in the media called it earlier, the campaign effectively used the carrot of the VP announcement to build up their SMS list.

Well, it seems someone in the Romney campaign paid attention. The campaign sent out this text message at 8:17AM EST this morning:

Who will be Mitt’s VP? Download the app and you’ll be the first to find out: http://mi.tt/QR50iY

While this message hit our West Coast SMS trackers at 5:17 AM (Mormons must not sleep in), we thought this is a great update, overall. Here are some takeaways:

  • If your campaign is large enough to create an app, look for creative ways like this to drive downloads.
  • But developing a single function app, like Mitt’s VP, is a bad idea. It’s a waste of resources and inertia–better to send them to the main campaign app.
  • Less is more. Obama use 158 characters in his message. Romney use 96. While the messages have different intents, use words wisely to maximize impact.
  • A personalized URL shortener, like http://mi.tt, is fantastic. Just make sure that it contains actual words and not an alphanumeric code. We typed in the wrong address and were bounced to a cute bit.ly error page. That kills word-of-mouth.
  • And by all means, invite us to forward the text message. According to PEW, 10% of adults they surveyed said text messages to friends and family in the 2010 midterms. That’s a ton of people even on a statewide race.

What are your thoughts on this text?